Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request for kernel-module-ntfs inclusion in fedora extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179276 ------- Additional Comments From alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-02-02 07:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > In reply to Comment #1 I was hoping that instead of an outright "no this wont > work" people would be willing to re-visit the possibility of the inclusion of > ntfs support. For what it's worth, I agree, I would prefer to see ntfs in Extras, for convenience. However bugzilla entry is probably not the best place to have a discussion in general (even though this is posted to the fedora-extras-list) unless it specifically about packaging related methods. http://producingoss.com/html-chunk/bug-tracker.html#bug-tracker-mailing-list-interaction I would leave open this bug post your spec file/SRPM, open up a new thread on fedora-extras-list discussing reconsidering ntfs support in Extras and post a link back here to the bug pointing out the Package Review submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
