Re: Fedora Extras RPMs should have Vendor and Packager?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:29 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I just was doing rpm -qi on a few packages, and noticed that packages 
> built in Extras don't have a vendor associated with them.
> 
> Not that anybody ever really looks at these things, but we should 
> probably set up the extras build system so that it prefills the vendor 
> pertaining to Fedora somehow.  We might also want to add "Packager"

You're not wrong, but currently mock and plague don't have the ability
to define Packager dynamically. Fortunately Vendor is a lot easier and
should require only a small change in the mock configuration files in
order to set it to "Fedora Extras".

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux