Hi folks, I've added some more checks to my package and BZ ticket checking script, and now have some questions: - what happens when a package goes from extras to core ? Should the "product" column be changed ? The matter is a bit compilcated by the fact that the package usually remains in extras for the previous/current releases - what's the general feeling about orphaned packages. Shouldn't they be removed from the devel repo until a maintainer steps up ? - there seems to be a sizeable amount of entries in owners file that have no corresponding package in the devel repo. Should BZ tickets be filed ? The matter here is a bit complicated because some packages might have been discontinued for devel but are still provided for older releases. Maybe there should be a way to indicate this in the owners file... I guess that's enough questions for now :-) Below is the current output of the script. Cheers, Christian --- === About owners file === We have 1410 extras packages in owners file. There are 65 orphans. Top 10 package owners: tcallawa at redhat dot com : 88 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 83 ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 82 matthias at rpmforge dot net : 70 andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 54 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 50 ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 41 rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 41 gauret at free dot fr : 40 steve at silug dot org : 35 We have 58 orphaned packages available in extras devel: abe anjuta apg apt arc at-poke bochs camstream cgoban cksfv conglomerate duplicity freedroidrpg galculator gdeskcal gkrellm-themes gnofract4d gnome-password-generator gnome-telnet gnome-themes-extras gnugo gonvert gpa gtkglarea2 gurlchecker hping2 libnet10 libzvt lincvs lua manedit meld mknbi netdiag nget ots p0f parchive perl-Net-SCP perl-Net-SSH perl-Parse-Yapp prozilla putty rpmproc scorched3d screem sirius synaptic tdl tetex-arabtex tetex-armtex tetex-font-tipa tetex-lgrind tla wbxml2 wesnoth xmms-cdread xtide We have 93 packages not available in extras devel: GiNaC R-RScaLAPACK R-hdf5 alsa-firmware amavisd-new apmud aqhbci-qt-tools buildsystem cdiff cdo compat-wxPythonGTK2 comps configure-thinkpad cryptplug dd_rescue drscheme ebtables fftw2 fillets-ng-data-cs freenx gcdmaster gcl gconfmm20 general gnome-applet-netmon gnome-cpufreq-applet gnome-theme-clearlooks gpredict gtkmm20 iiimf-le-simplehangul initng inti juk k3b-ape kiosktool kxdocker kxdocker-resources libgcrypt1 libglademm20 libgnomecanvasmm20 libgnomemm20 libgnomeuimm20 libgsf113 libmatchbox libsafe lirc-kmod lirc-kmod-common lout nabi newpg nx openbox opendap openoffice-extras osiv pam_pkcs11 perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo perl-Class-Loader perl-Convert-ASCII-Armour perl-Convert-PEM perl-Crypt-DES_EDE3 perl-GD-SVG perl-Graph perl-Heap perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages perl-SOAP-Lite perl-SVG perl-Text-Levenshtein perl-Text-Shellwords perl-XML-Writer perl-bioperl php-pear-DB php-pecl-sqlite qemu rsnapshot sblim-cmpi-base scrub smb4k squidGuard stripesnoop superkaramba swish-e tetex-beamer tetex-pgf tetex-xcolor thinkpad-kmod thinkpad-kmod-common tpctl wmweather+ wp_tray wxPython xaliclock yakuake We have 27 packages that moved to core: anthy firefox gmime kasumi libchewing libevent m17n-db m17n-lib nautilus-sendto perl-Archive-Zip perl-IO-String perl-IO-Zlib perl-Net-IP perl-String-CRC32 perl-XML-Simple python-elementtree python-sqlite scim scim-anthy scim-chewing scim-hangul scim-m17n scim-pinyin scim-qtimm scim-tables sqlite thunderbird === About FE-ACCEPT packages === We have 10 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the package in the development repo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165488,168185,171601,172136,172144,172150,172151,173216,174266,179444 We have 5 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the package in the owners file: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165992,167863,168185,168920,171801 We have 464 accepted, closed package reviews Top 10 BZ review requests submitters: tcallawa at redhat dot com : 43 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 41 andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 29 fedora dot wickert at arcor dot de : 28 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 24 rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 18 pertusus at free dot fr : 14 orion at cora dot nwra dot com : 13 paul at city-fan dot org : 12 ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 12 Top 10 BZ review requests reviewers: paul at city-fan dot org : 64 gauret at free dot fr : 63 gdk at redhat dot com : 34 jpmahowald at gmail dot com : 28 tcallawa at redhat dot com : 26 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 22 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 20 ed at eh3 dot com : 19 adrian at lisas dot de : 18 ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 13 We have 11 accepted, open package reviews where the package appears to already be in the repo... All open packages already available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=166207,166251,166252,166253,166254,168905,176618,177038,177083,177166,179263 === About FE-NEW packages === We have 9 closed tickets still blocking FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=167621,168906,177272,177274,177662,177859,178141,178902,179039 === About FE-REVIEW packages === We have 1 closed tickets still blocking FE-REVIEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=172267 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
