ville.skytta@xxxxxx said: > Note that depending on what "Top 10 packagers" means, counting FE-ACCEPTed > packages from Bugzilla might not be the right thing to do. Loads of packages > in Extras were imported from fedora.us and so don't have any reviews in > bugzilla.redhat.com. Counting that metric from owners.list could be better. You're quite right. I now also parse the owners file and changed the wording of some things. Here's the current output. I'll update the scripts wiki page shortly. There are still quite a number of additional things I'd like to check... just have to find some time... Cheers, Christian --- === About owners file === We have 1392 extras packages in owners file. There are 67 orphans. Top 10 package owners: tcallawa at redhat dot com : 88 ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 82 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 81 matthias at rpmforge dot net : 70 andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 54 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 50 ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 41 rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 41 gauret at free dot fr : 40 steve at silug dot org : 28 === About FE-ACCEPT packages === We have 10 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the package in the development repo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165488,168185,171601,172136,172144,172150,172151,173216,174266,177083 We have 5 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find the package in the owners file: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165992,167863,168185,168920,171801 We have 452 accepted, closed package reviews Top 10 BZ review requests submitters: tcallawa at redhat dot com : 43 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 41 andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 29 fedora dot wickert at arcor dot de : 26 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 22 rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 18 orion at cora dot nwra dot com : 13 pertusus at free dot fr : 13 ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 12 paul at city-fan dot org : 11 Top 10 BZ review requests reviewers: gauret at free dot fr : 63 paul at city-fan dot org : 62 gdk at redhat dot com : 34 tcallawa at redhat dot com : 24 jpmahowald at gmail dot com : 24 rc040203 at freenet dot de : 22 jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 19 adrian at lisas dot de : 18 ed at eh3 dot com : 18 ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 14 We have 11 accepted, open package reviews where the package appears to already be in the repo... All open packages already available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=166207,166251,166252,166253,166254,168905,171334,171336,176618,177038,177166 === About FE-NEW packages === We have 9 closed tickets still blocking FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=167621,168906,177272,177274,177662,177859,178141,178902,179039 === About FE-REVIEW packages === -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
