Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 arma@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arma@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From arma@xxxxxxx 2006-01-28 18:07 EST ------- Hi folks, I'm the Tor project leader, Roger Dingledine ("the upstream"). I've been trying to keep an eye on this discussion. What I most want from this is an rpm that I can point people running Red Hat like systems to. So anything that confuses people on various RPM-based systems is bad. (This seems to include the lsb stuff, if what Kevin says is right.) (Enrico's point about running the RPM on a system without gcc, make, etc is odd, since most people I know use their computer for many things at once.) We currently ship an RPM spec file that seems to work pretty well. The only problem is that we don't have an official unified maintainer that we know to maintain it, build new RPMs, and so on. Keeping the Fedora Extras spec similar to this would help in sending patches upstream and downstream. I'm also concerned about dependencies like fedora-groupadd. Is this going to be an RPM that is only useful for people running a particular configuration of Fedora, or can we make it more general? If it is too niche, then we will end up with competing RPMs, which is bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
