On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:38 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 16:43 -0500, Jack Neely wrote: > > 2) Creating kmod-openafs-smp it requires kernel-smp-i686. The > > kernel-smp prackage provides kernel-i686 and kernel-smp but not the > > above. This is the current rawhide kernel I'm building against. What's > > the plan here? I haven't seen kernel-<variant>-<arch> used before. > > $ rpm -qp --provides .../kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.1878_FC5.i686.rpm > kernel = 2.6.15 > kernel-drm = 4.3.0 > kernel-i686 = 2.6.15-1.1878_FC5smp > kernel-smp = 2.6.15-1.1878_FC5 > $ rpm -qp --provides .../kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.1878_FC5.ppc.rpm > kernel = 2.6.15 > kernel-drm = 4.3.0 > kernel-ppc = 2.6.15-1.1878_FC5smp > kernel-smp = 2.6.15-1.1878_FC5 > > Definitely looks broken to me. Although IMO the package should provide > kernel-<variant>-<arch>, even though yum should only grab the proper > arch. Argh, thanks for the heads up, I wonder how I didn't notice this. The issue was introduced with the RHEL compatibility changes to kmodtool, and the problem is that there's no way to require a fully qualified kernel package so that it'd work with FC and RHEL. FC kernels provide kernel-<arch> = <version><variant>, RHEL ones do not, and RHEL kernels provide kernel-<variant>-<arch> = <version>, FC not. I added a detection hack to kmodtool 0.10.4 (see lirc-kmod and thinkpad-kmod in CVS), that seems to work for me now with FC4, Rawhide, and CentOS 4.2. Adding the kernel-<variant>-<arch> = <version> provision to the FC kernels wouldn't hurt, though. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
