> > > > Don't include any binary only bits, and we dodge the iffy RE clause. > > > Which is what I'll do and make a similar package for livna, including only > > > the binary parts. > > > > That seems like the best plan of action. > > Would be, if iscan could be packaged that way. Unfortunately, it still requires > a non-free, binary-only library libesmod.so.1. So, is it OK to package that > library even if we don't have its source? IMHO, this would blatantly violate Fedora Extras guidelines. Why don't you just package the whole thing for Livna or somewhere else? I doubt it would be usable without the binary stuff anyway, so what's the point of putting unusable libs into Extras? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
