Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178709 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-26 05:11 EST ------- I contacted the upstream team to obtain some explanation : ---------- the freehdl thingie does this: Probably you understand better then... 1. Translates a VHDL file into C++ file(s). 2. Runs a C++ compiler (gcc) in order to compile the generated files. This is why the header files are required for the app! 3. Runs a C++ compiler (gcc) in order to link the objects produced in step 2 to produce a binary. In this step the libraries are used, so these are required for the app as well! 4. Runs the binary produced in step 3. ---------- so i think all the files are required in only one package, no ? (In reply to comment #15) > No, /usr/lib and /usr/include are on the system include/library paths in GCC. > Therefore, explicitly passing them to the compiler always is a bug because it > interferes with the system include/library paths (cf. -isystem in gcc.info rsp. > man gcc). Should a package require them, its design is broken. The flags etc. necessary if someone would like to relocate the package (other --prefix than /usr). So i think it's an upstream problem, no ? (In reply to comment #15) > Apply iconv ("iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8") to the source files somewhere inside > of the spec (e.g. in %prep). Alternatively, you could do this outside of the > spec and apply a patch. Please let me know which files have this problem then i could solve it and fill a bug upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
