Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehdl : GPLed free VHDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178709 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-26 02:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) ... > > I think it's not relevant with this package. > What makes you think so? I disagree on this. > If these files are host development files (very likely), then they should go to > a *-devel package, if these files are target development files they are > miss-places. I'd suggest you to implement a *-devel package. I don't know what to do about it! at the beginning i have implemented a devel package but contacting upstream and comparing with ghdl (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172547) leads me to make only one package as for a compliler. All these files are needed by freehdl to be compiled with gcc. I'm not a specialist with this so i would like to have more opinions. > Besides this, there are further minor issues: > * freehdl-config --cxxflags returns -I/usr/include > * freehdl-config --ldflags returns -L/usr/lib I'm not sure to see where the problem is. the returns seems fine for me. no ? > * Some of the doc files aren't utf-8 nor asci encoded (German umlauts, probably > iso8859-1 or iso8859-15 encoded). You are right. How to solve this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
