Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From jarkko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-25 18:23 EST ------- I wrote this before I saw the above comment from Kevin Kofler: -- Perhaps you have left out kdelibs from ksmarttray requirements in purpose because rpm will add the library files as automatic file deps anyway. It seems the majority of the packages doesn't say they require glibc for example. They just require libc.so.6 as an automatic file dep. So this wasn't important really. And if you think about it, I'd say the file deps are in a sense more accurate even as they only require what is absolutely necessary and also don't take a stand about which package should provide them (less to maintain in the spec file). Well, you can't think the auto deps will always take care of everything but with C-libraries they do just that. And kdelibs here is a package which contain C-libraries. -- Good to know there is a policy about this. Kevin Kofler, can you say if there's also policy for the gui package name issue and the rpm version number issue? A policy would define what to do here so we would not have to argue about this matter. So just forget about the first issue, only two left if you ask me (I don't count the usermode issue because I agree with Enrico Scholz there). :) 1) smart-gtk --> smart-gui 2) rpm version numbers to requirements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
