Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wm-icons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177082 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-25 13:10 EST ------- + mock succesfully build the source RPM - Source0 should list the full path of URL: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 should be, for example, http://wm-icons.sourceforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 - Changelog has a typo: " * Fri Jan 06 2006 James Lawrence <fedorajim@xxxxxxxxx> 0.4.0-3.FC4 - modified spec file removed FC4 from release line " You mean version 0.3.0-3? - rpmlint generated these errors: W: wm-icons non-standard-group X11/Window Managers W: wm-icons incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-3.FC4 0.3.0-3 E: wm-icons no-binary W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/menu /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/16x16-general E: wm-icons zero-length /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/16x16-kde/_symlinks.lst W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/norm /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/48x48-general E: wm-icons standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons W: wm-icons devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/wm-icons-config W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/mini /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/14x14-general Could you make sure to do both md5sum and sha1sum on source tarball for both SRPM and the downloaded tarball you received? These methods are used for security process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
