Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-01-25 11:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I think it would be better to behave like grub package, i.e. place these > x86-specific files under /usr/share/makebootfat/x86/* . IMHO it is more correct, > because under /usr/lib we should place some HOST-specific internal binaries, but > actually these two files are TARGET-specific... OK, doing it like grub makes sense in that respect. Do it that way, and tell upstream about this discussion about where to put these files, if you would please. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
