Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mud Magic Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176200 wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk@xxxxxxxxxx |wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-25 00:09 EST ------- Hmm, it looks like you are basing this package on the old fedora.us guidelines. It is apparent that you haven't read the new Fedora Extras guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/ Please read through the new packaging requirements and process. A few obvious things that need fixing, there might be more... - %define version 1.8 This is unnecessary, just put the number directly after Version: - Release: does not follow the new Extras guidelines - %{_libdir}/libmudmagic.a %{_libdir}/libmudmagic.la Do not ship these within the package. Please delete them perhaps during %install. I suppose it is OK to fix up the spec first in this case, but typically one only submits a package for review only after they have a version that they intend on releasing. Please re-submit another URL when you have read through the packaging guidelines and made necessary changes. Maybe wait until after you have an official 1.8 release too in order to avoid confusion? After package approval, sponsorship of your membership will be based not on the package approval but your demonstration of understanding of the guidelines and process as documented in those web pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
