Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From jarkko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-23 17:59 EST ------- There are both names out there in the repo, -gui and -gtk. There seems to be a "policy" that frontends are usually named as -gui when libraries are named as -gtk. There are some frontends which are named as -gtk though, but those seem to have their executable also named like that. All (or at least majority of) graphical frontend packages seem to be named as -gui. I'd like to follow that "policy" here. Especially when the gui is launched with the command "smart --gui". (I know the interface dir is named as "gtk" but I think it would be more consistent to follow the visible side of it.) Just wanted to try to convince you more and explain why we others request the name change. Other than this, I'd say the spec is ok. Do others still want to bring smart-usermode to the main package? I really think that it is perfect like it is now because smart-usermode will be installed with the graphical packages automatically as dependencies. And we don't want to add unnecessary deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
