[Bug 175980] Review Request: w3c-libwww

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: w3c-libwww


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175980


pertusus@xxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pertusus@xxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2006-01-19 17:13 EST -------
w3c-libwww has also been submitted as bug 178310.

The other submitted w3c-libwww seems to me to be in better shape, as it has some
important patches allready, it uses macros better and the separation of apps in
a subpackage seems right to me. In fact the other seems to be derived from the
fedora core package while this one isn't. However, this one was the first to be
submitted so it should be the one considered. Maybe you could get in touch with
the submitter of the other bug or restart from the spec file in the other bug,
or get the good ideas from the other submission?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux