Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 10:56 -0600, Steven Pritchard a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:29:12AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > --- perl-HTML-Mason.spec 16 Sep 2005 20:17:49 -0000 1.2
> > > +++ perl-HTML-Mason.spec 11 Jan 2006 01:00:28 -0000 1.3
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > Name: perl-HTML-Mason
> > > -Version: 1.3101
> > > -Release: 3%{?dist}
> > > +Version: 1.32
> > > +Release: 1%{?dist}
> >
> > This change doesn't work.
> >
> > RPM-wise, version 1.3101 is greater than version 1.32, so people won't
> > ever see this update.
>
> Argh. I didn't think of that.
>
> Do I have any choice other than an Epoch bump?
I did an epoch bump for the same reason on another perl package two days
ago. The solution would be to convince upstream to use a fixed-digit
version number (padding with zeros if necessary) but the idea might not
be well received. In fact in my case the response was such I almost
orphaned the package at once.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
