[Bug 178330] Review Request: Azureus - a BitTorrent Client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Azureus - a BitTorrent Client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178330





------- Additional Comments From chabotc@xxxxxxxxx  2006-01-19 12:29 EST -------
Formal review list so far:

MUST review items:
- Builds cleanly on FC5 devel.
- Source included doesn't match upsteam source, but for a good reason :-)
- Package name meets guidelines
- spec file name is in %{name}.spec format
- Licence is fedora extra's compatible & is included
- Spec file is in (american) english
- Does not list buildrequires that are excepted in the package guidelines
- All build dependencies are listed
- No ldconfig needed
- All files have proper permissions
- Package is not relocatable
- No duplicate files in %files section
- No missing files in %files section
- Has a proper %clean section with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Uses macro's described in PackagingGuidelines
- No entries in %doc that are required for standard program operation
- No -devel package needed
- Proper directory-ownerships
- **ERROR: No complete desktop file & install handling yet

Should items:
- Includes upstream licence(s) file
- No insane scriplets
- No unnescesarry requires
- Mock build cleanly

Almost there!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux