On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 13:50 +0100, Andreas Bierfert wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paul F. Johnson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > >>>Quoting GregDeKoenigsberg from the Fedora Foundation: "Business > >>>considerations that prevented certain Mono components from being > >>>included in Fedora previously have now been resolved." > >> > >>Which, to be blunt, tells us nothing at all. > > > > > > Actually, it tells you that mono is go and as such, we can package and > > release mono components in Core and (presumably) Extras. > > Maybe it does but I guess what people are wondering about (but do not spell out) > is this: Why was this decision made without talking to FESCo and the FE > community? You've got it - That's one point. Another point is speculation on "what has changed?". Most significant change on Fedora, recently: The equally sudden emphasize on the "Noncommercial Fedora Foundation". This, combined with the sudden appearance of mono and the GDK statement above gives a nice picture ;) > Maybe rejecting mono stuff from extras for now will get us this explanation > maybe it won't. I don't know but this maybe the reason for this reaction and > other reactions we see. > I want to stress that this is simply my understanding of the stuff that is going > on atm and _not_ my opinion on the topic... after all I am pro _fedora_. So am I, but I can't deny the thought, there might be something "cheesy" going on ... Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
