On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:26 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:44:49 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:22 +0330, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:11 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > > - that mono will not be considered for inclusion in Extras for FC-3/FC-4 > > > > until FC-5 goes GOLD. > > > > > > FC3 will be unsupported when FC5 test2 comes out. Should we still allow > > > new FC3 packages in extras after that?! > > > > It's at the maintainer's discretion. Note that FE currently has some > > packages with branches going all the way back to RHL9. > > No. Fedora Extras is only for FC3 and above. The older branches are > fedora.us stuff. Nonetheless there is sufficient metadata in CVS for them. The buildsystem is another issue though. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
