Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itext - a PDF creation library in java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176981 ------- Additional Comments From green@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-16 21:03 EST ------- New files are here: Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/itext.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/itext-1.3-1jpp_5.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > Is it still worth having the %define section free in the spec file? Or is it > there to keep it as close to the JPackage one as possible? Kind of looks out of > place there :-) I'm trying to make as few changes as possible, and will send those changes I make back to the JPackage maintainer for itext. > Licence is often written as 'MPL' and not fully "Mozilla Public Licence" (just > as GPL/BSD/LGPL etc are written shorthand), mozilla its self uses MPL too so i > think thats the example to follow, also by examples of other packages i think > the proper format would be: MPL/LGPL Ok. > Still one inconsitent version in the changelog according to rpmlint: > W: itext incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.3-1jpp_4 1.3-1jpp_4 I can't make this one go away (although now it says _5). > rpmlint Group warnings: > W: itext-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation > W: itext-manual non-standard-group Development/Documentation > Its either Development/Libraries, or "Documentation", Development/Documentation > unfortunatly doesn't exist. Please use "Documenation" for the 2 sub packages > with the docs. Fixed. > other rpmlint warning: > W: itext-manual hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/itext-1.3/ant/.ant.properties > But this is ignorable > > The package also owns / inclues: > /usr/share/java/itext > But this is an empty directory .. is there any reason for its being there? If > not please remove Removed. Thanks! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
