On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Patrick Barnes wrote: > > say "You can sign the CLA". If it's required, we should change it to > > "must sign the CLA". > > > They read "can" and not "must" due to the option of using a written > signature and postal courier. CLAs may also not be necessary in all cases. Posting/FAXing the CLA is not an option any more. People must use the account system, so the wording should be 'must'. > Part of it is availability. It is likely that more use of GPG keys will > be made in the future. Exactly - besides the CLA, the main reason to collect GPG key ids is their potential value in the future. Best, -- Elliot Red Hat Summit Nashville (May 30 - June 2, 2006) http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/ -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
