Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lucidlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177881 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-16 03:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I just thought of something. My spec file currently has a direct dependency on > GTK+ 2.6 or higher. Since FC3 is being end-of-life'd tomorrow with the release > of FC5 Test 2, and FC4 includes GTK+ 2.6, do I really that strict version > dependency there? I know it's probably a very minor issue, but I think it could > help keep the spec file clean. Thanks for your input. I would be inclined to leave the explicit requirement, for the benefit of people that want to rebuild your package for other distros themselves (FC3 will go to legacy and many people will still use it, and someone rebuilds most Extras packages for CentOS too - see http://centos.karan.org/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
