Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828 ------- Additional Comments From icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-15 16:18 EST ------- 1. Yes, you have a point -- should be python-tidy 2. Hmm... I could have sworn it required python-devel. At least fedora-newrpmspec always includes python-devel into the BuildRequires for python packages. Ah, well -- it seems to still build and work fine, so I removed it. 3. BuildRequires python >= 2.3 is really not necessary, since we're building for FC4 and up, and that dependency will always be satisfied. Final packages already depend on python-abi being the same version as build environment. 4. Yeah, libtidy is unversioned, and I'm actually not sure how to best deal with it. Ultimately, ctypes still depends on the underlying API remaining the same, and if the bindings didn't use python-ctypes, RPM would have hard-coded it to depend on libtidy-0.99.so.0. On the other hand, I don't want to specify it in the SRPM, since that would be just ugly. I'm going to ask this on the -extras list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
