[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583





------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-01-13 08:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Jeffrey, you know that we're still considering switching to another, slightly
> modified proposal? One where you don't have to hard-code the kernel-variants in
> the spec-file (would avoid problems like the ones in comments #2 to #4 in the
> future)
> 
> You should probably be a bit patient and wait for the final version of the
> kernel-module packaging standard.

I'll keep updating my packages as the proposal evolves, but I really hope that
something comes together soon.  People have been waiting for a long time for
Asterisk in Fedora Extras, and getting Zaptel approved is a necessary first
step.  I think that packaging the Zaptel modules will serve as a good test case
for the kernel module proposal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux