Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-01-13 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Jeffrey, you know that we're still considering switching to another, slightly > modified proposal? One where you don't have to hard-code the kernel-variants in > the spec-file (would avoid problems like the ones in comments #2 to #4 in the > future) > > You should probably be a bit patient and wait for the final version of the > kernel-module packaging standard. I'll keep updating my packages as the proposal evolves, but I really hope that something comes together soon. People have been waiting for a long time for Asterisk in Fedora Extras, and getting Zaptel approved is a necessary first step. I think that packaging the Zaptel modules will serve as a good test case for the kernel module proposal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
