Am Freitag, den 13.01.2006, 08:10 -0500 schrieb Jeff Spaleta: > On 1/13/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Prove it please *with the new scheme*. Seems I'm to dumb to see the > > problem (if there is any). > > Are there some mockup kernel modules/userspace packages that use the > new scheme. The URLs were posted before in the other kmod-thread: Two real-life examples can be found at: Lirc; Userland (in addition to the lirc package in cvs; note this practically results in three SRPMS for lirc -- the lirc-kmod-common part was split out for other maintaining reasons, normally it should be a subpackage of the normal lirc package) http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/lirc-kmod-common-0.8.0-2.src.rpm Kernel-Module: http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/lirc-kmod-0.8.0-0.6.pre3.2.6.15_1.1819_FC5.src.rpm Thinkpad; Useland: http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/thinkpad-kmod-common-5.8-5.src.rpm Kernel-Module: http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/thinkpad-kmod-5.8-6.2.6.15_1.1819_FC5.src.rpm And the last stuff from the discussion that is still considered a bit experimental; But it's the one I'd like to use (if others agree) is found here: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/lirc-kmod-0.8.0-0.7.pre3.2.6.14_1.1776_FC4.src.rpm Ohh, and Jack Neely did some for openafs: http://linuxczar.net/openafs/ > I'm more than happy to brutalize them as a user looking > for unforseen problems. Great! HTH CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
