Re: Question about licence for "boost" libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yep two other people on the list pointed this out to me earlier today,
but thanks :-)



On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 12:48 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Chris Chabot <chabotc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Some package i was trying to give a review has a much newer upstream
> > version available, however it requires the "boost filesystem" libraries
> > to function (c++ libs)
> 
> Uhm.. you realise that boot is already a part of Fedora Core right?
> 
> on my fc4  system yum list "*boost*"
> Available Packages
> boost.i386                               1.33.0-3.fc4           updates-testing
> boost-debuginfo.i386                     1.33.0-3.fc4           updates-testing
> boost-devel.i386                         1.33.0-3.fc4           updates-testing
> boost-doc.i386                           1.33.0-3.fc4           updates-testing
> 
> -jef"I don't understand the point of this question."spaleta
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux