2017-10-17 18:56 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 06:09:12PM +0200, Robert Kratky wrote: >> However, I would agree that it would be good to suggest where to go >> next. Except, I wouldn't make it a 'next' button but a list of >> 'additional resources' that are related to what is being discussed on >> the viewed page. Of course, this cannot be automated (at least not >> with the content we have), but it would provide more value. > > This seems right. Also, what can we do to make sure we have the > metadata so that it *could* be automated? The content needs to be modular and appropriately tagged. The former is a major undertaking that requires not only time but a certain amount of expertise as well (though we're trying to lower the threshold). The latter should ideally happen hand in hand with content conversion/creation. For all other content, it is a lot of work but not necessarily difficult. I imagine a three-day FAD with five dedicated people could accomplish it. Robert _______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
