If Pagure requires a +1 on top of FAS, that would disqualify it in my eyes. One thing that makes Bugzilla better is that the bugs would be a lot closer to the actual software that's being documented -- making it possible to clone engineering bugs into docs bugs etc. Robert 2017-08-13 12:35 GMT+02:00 Silvia Sanchez <bhkohane@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Hello, > > It's my very personal opinion, but I always found Bugzilla rather painful. I > think Pagure Issues is better for Documentation. > Just my 2 pence. > > Regards, > Silvia > > > On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 12:30 +0200, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > > Hi All, > > Which do we want to use for documentation bugs, Pagure Issues or > Bugzilla BZs? > > If we aren't going to use Pagure Issues, I want to turn off the issues > for the repos and provide bug reporting guidance. By the same token, if > we aren't going to use BZs, I'd like to work with that team to see if we > can get some kind of forwarding or other solution to keep things from > getting lost. > > My preferences is Issues at it puts bugs near the PRs, however there is > no requirement for this from my perspective. The negative is that I > believe you have to have a FAS (and possibly a +1) to report a Pagure > Issue, while only a lighterweight BZ account is required for Bugzilla. > That said, I think bugzilla is much harder for casual users to use. > > We need opinions please. > > regards, > > bex > _______________________________________________ > docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > _______________________________________________ > docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
