On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:21:31AM -0600, Pete Travis wrote: > As to where Docs will fall, I'm torn. I think that we most need to > improve on collaboration with development and QA, with a feedback loop > from those groups enabling us to be more proactive in producing > up-to-date content. I see Docs as providing a service to packagers and > developers, and a value-add for end users. Some kids like to build > their legos according to the instructions! (If I'm off message here, > someone please check me!) OTOH, Docs concerns don't quite fit well in > the planning stages of an Engineering discussion, and I worry that our > message would get drowned out in that context. Yeah, makes sense. I don't think it necessarily needs to be an either-or — the intent certainly isn't to create _bigger_ splits in the project. > Of course, we could collaborate with QA & Devel as part of the Outreach > group too. Keeping pace with user demand is potentially more important > than tracking the updates repo, and maybe we can improve more by > increasing our feedback from users, reaching out to them for input, and > creating opportunities for casual participation. Definitively, we are This sounds convincing, though. :) > Anyway, I hope there's enough in my rambling to keep the discussion > going, and everyone involved is conscious of the potential for siloing > of Outreach and Engineering efforts. In the ideal picture, having some teams which are primarily in one area but have a foot in the other should help bridge the two. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
