On 07/10/2014 01:09 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Speaking as a rather stale member, I think it makes sense to use the
> non-repsonsive maintainer policy[1] for guide owners. For revoking
> git-granting roles, 12 months seems like a good cutoff, since that's
> two (or at least one and then some) releases with no activity. The
> question is "what counts as activity"?
>
> I'd argue against FAS login, since that's not docs-related activity.
> Even if someone is super-active elsewhere, I'm not sure it makes sense
> to keep them in docs-{writers,publishers} without making a docs-ish
> contribution. What counts as docs participation? Obviously git
> commits, meeting attendance, docs mailing list posts, Release Notes
> wiki editing. Maybe also non-RN wiki editing, probably other things.
> Not all of these are easy to automate, of course, but that's an
> implementation detail.
>
>
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers :P
I like it. The process works for other maintainers, it should for us too.
Most of anything people do within Fedora's infrastructure is on Fedmsg, so I asked in #fedora-apps and was pointed at datagrepper[2]. We can probably define a query that will show a given user's fedorahosted repo commits, wiki edits, or other things of relevance. Combine that with mailing list or irc activity and we can come up with a fairy good picture I'm not even sure that this merits automation, tbh, but I won't stand in anyone's way
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?user=bcotton
--
-- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immanetize@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
