On 06/24/2013 07:41 PM, Leslie S
Satenstein wrote:
Hi Leslie, Have you created an FAS account? Really, the only 'formal' distinction - besides active participation - is getting sponsored for membership in the docs FAS group. You and I have talked about a lot of the docs procedural stuff, so I won't hash over it again, but feel free to ask if you have questions. As you've said you primarily want to contribute reviews, I think Docs QA[1] might be a good fit for you. QA contacts review guides to identify outdated content or undocumented changes and communicate them to the guide owners. It would be best to review They also perform QA on bugs[2]. The docs-qa mailing list[3] is the default QA contact for all of our guides, and would ideally be used for docs QA related discussion. I do feel obligated to remind you, though: we don't do machine translation. The primary function of docs QA, as stated in the guidelines linked below, is to identify technical shortcomings (deprecated information, new features, etc) and blatant writing errors (spelling, broken links, etc). Many of our writers are also multilingual, but there aren't that many of us! If the information is current and functionally correct, rewriting copy that has already been written and translated just isn't a good use of our time. Anyway, as always, do reach out to the group if we can help you. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA_Procedure [3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs-qa -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - 'randomuser' on freenode - immanetize@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs