Re: Can't publish readme-burning-iso to docs for Fedora 18 to docs website

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 18:10 -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:23:58AM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:53:04AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:43 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, tiansworld
> > > > > <tiansworld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I forgot to mention that this git clone is needed for cloning the
> > > > > > readme-burning-iso git repo for publishing the doc.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > That page is fairly old. I've never needed the doc utils to publish
> > > > > Burning ISOs.
> > > > 
> > > > More than "fairly" old.  fedora-docs-utils was used prior to Publican.
> > > > Somewhere around Fedora 10 or 11 we converted all the documents to
> > > > Publican.
> > > 
> > > Agreed.  This is why the Trac instances for docs is bad.  Too much
> > > old "common" data gets posted and never updated.
> > 
> > ACK:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/readme-burning-isos/wiki/WikiStart?action=history
> > 
> > That WikiStart page hasn't been updated in years.  But any FAS user
> > can update it, so I encourage someone to modify it as necessary, no
> > sacred cows.
> 
> Paul: Is there any reason to keep the Trac instance at all?  Perhaps now would be a good time to terminate these instances and just maintain the regular wiki.  AFAIK, no one is using the ticketing systems or any other piece of Trac.

Or maybe replace everything on the trac with links to BZ

-McD

> 
> --Eric


-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux