----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > 2. Note that I'm not advocating for the "user, sysadmin, dev" > categories to change in docs-land; I think that these stories/themes > are likely to change with each release. But, given the > intertwinement > of docs and marketing when it comes to the release announcement, it > seems like (if docs is crafting the tech-bits of the release > announcement) if we were to bucketize by stories, that we'd need to > get marketing to figure out what those stories are. And I don't just > mean the overarching stories, but also the individual feature > stories, > in some cases; I can't tell you how many times I look at a feature > and > say, wow, I wish I spoke that language, I wonder what the bigger > picture is, what this effectively enables? Maybe the talking points > is > a launch point for that as well, in additoin to being the list that > gets handed off to ambassadors, and then can drive the story > collections in a release announcement, or in one-page release notes; > I'm not sure. Thoughts? The workflow, as often seems to be the case > between docs & mktg, is key. I'll skip directly to the workflow here - as I generally agree with the idea you'd like to implement. So for workflow - what we have now? We have features/change proposals, from these we have to in some way prepare release notes -> extend to documentation for bigger changes, the second part are talking points -> featuring "shiny" changes -> and finally flipped to release announcement and other marketing stuff. Currently all of these are tracked in different places, we still don't have a strong ownership of individual tasks and it often goes out of sync (aka was this feature/change really finished, so we can document it and market it?). What I do right now, I'm trying to revamp feature/change proposal template, the Feature List and I'd like to "centralize" the planning and tracking of not only development but also these tasks. How could it look like? Instead of plain Features List, I'd like to have a clear overview, generated (I have scripts) from Change Proposals pages. It's very rough draft! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/ChangeSet The template could be extended - not only to be change owner place, but to offer planning/tracking space for Docs, QA, Marketing etc. See our current draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaroslavReznik/ChangeProposalTemplate My question is - what would be useful for your teams to be available in the change proposal page? What's needed for tracking RNs, TPs etc. - tracking bugs, ownership etc. I can definitely help here with coordination - one place for the process from beginning to the end - to release could make it more manageable. I'm not saying it's perfect, very theoretical for now - but we can be flexible, there's not so much time for Fedora 20 but it can be on going effort - to make it better and perfect one day ;-) Robyn, sorry - I don't want to kidnap your topic :) just it's one part - the wokflow, how. Thanks Jaroslav > Basically: Seeking feedback? Thoughts, anyone? :D > > -Robyn > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
