-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/28/2013 01:25 PM, sankarshan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Dimitri Glezos > <glezos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Have the costs of having two separate platforms been carefully & >> openly weighted by the L10n community? Has it discussed, >> requested and approved the usage of another platform? > > I'm a bit lost here - do components which are part of Fedora > receive a mandate to not choose any infrastructure other than > those hosted/supported by Fedora ? AFAIK, there is no mandate. That said, by scattering the work around to different systems, translators have a more difficult time trying to find what needs to be done. It's more efficient to have a single location to work from, IMO. It's also simpler from the Docs end so we don't have so many tools to use to pull in the translations. - --Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRBtLiAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRLLYQAKbKs42bImN1dhiIvtPFQeLm mbnOlTHsD1El+MYC3D5JoWwPvg+BKV3iBi8Wx/XYx4maY+kupzqr0gM81vIuZ0/v iDaFhm+Tydt/A33mbskFdpIYxvjZwIHPC/nbgGNjuISkXp15cvutThfOUe0A0O5D vEeTQBMSP4lDYSTBocbKYb8Yn2DH60ppeEOF+pRjiE6aeQyTU5VWYwsZAEH3HHtD cvwPJLgtDd8JR7g0S7rVmNz9Mwuo5aJmUrNsrb4fKUamNBUKeAfa480GReDRZB6z RVV9vK1VdSFEdughVznHoVmq8FtO9fEZylvY1seUh9nfGyWO9TkAF26Ku4JSKrTv f8X5nN/NqwBWESXUZvJU1HcQ7x6hpIGpZwuLr54QzGN6sLOOicITCNSIcvAjRCum lcSwD/uDoKob9fb9d3ATR10naFwWyNUyqbi5ZJZi1ln8IZ3rJ2QmitB0mnYh2Vfg OvArctv5jJZ3u1CliCn4rZzXP+ctUJG4ssQMhz72+78m7vL/LmRDsYLY3v3SjH31 lCanNu9zg+ZRC2Rc7FPWK/aRe/jNHd7SS1opCPu++gf/u2F3BIRw3ydlPsGM8JmG Ky1X/25tn3C/bPNLnLSk9q+tBl5DNSsi8Oo9BaXLuDVQk9T8aQyKVYJLdNuU8kHU GL0CI5tVVpTgLeUBIMt5 =nsXa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
