-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:00:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > At the last meeting, we seemed to come to an agreement on the > procedure. I've captured the refinements we discussed[0], Please point > out any glaring flawsyou see. Let's use this procedure for the F17 > cycle and then we can see where we need to improve the process. > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA_Procedure Not sure if this has happened yet or not but should I/someone change *all* BZ components to use Docs-QA for the default QA contact? What about existing tickets? I can do this without too much trouble if needed. - -- Eric - -------------------------------------------------- Eric H Christensen eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Sparks" sparks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .... .. .-.. .-.. --- .-- --- .-. .-.. -.. 097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1 - -------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO/1WyAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRrOwP/2o+c63G0gZVziu/7Yzi1L5x 2AewULnDD87M6jZpq+8i51dEy2UbxKEr3a0bwODtFl2LLyiHkdq/yB25EZKxN/Wz aNzZISNZ4SXBRhbYRdeGodC8d/PcoubhoGdpyMz01qoY7WgO4H224aHSuWGwPn+y Atro16gbrYGtMtBGL8esgBCHtWZWkKDY6qxwJ7QPHyT5YcNr+zGeLdO9vQwOxmXu q5SKqcXEovQR36jrDdATBxAuXsPHqCj+z1VShyeYc/+M59cQTSzJmT/3bncKrW85 ZYLdkPdsRoAmSjnZuZ69JvUHcQzaeY9D0h8prnPhSvZmklmZtMMfcbEp+rUvFH5n BkXYGogIQ07yNAvsbiBUn5EqA2gf4rJo0Ar27M24SnDDcd5e98TlXxfbhN6qfzOV s/zNfEZf88/ctkDGBO0CscxSW8KkC1e53xOzVTsR/ujS8gci0aXQA8gWZKOIpmFI apkSo3R4gtjIvT5DoiBRjRhSFey76oahRf0LLdzIijasZtZEqEgOUR34Z3Iqffql O87DGSVCjVHK1RMWr3QMpoPHFU/oZWheelAqQIER76hBG9lOqaS5sPtwvzE0Uzwa mCw6toRr4I+6t6RB2oQHhdFRQSVkugJq00kMpaMqopG39+J9V/9c5tEL+CPFX44O fI5OuJkMKEFfzdO+jm8s =3XXJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
