> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:25:33 +0900 > From: Misha Shnurapet <shnurapet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [clip] > 31.10.2011, 23:05, "Kévin Raymond" <shaiton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > I think that you should not include Revision History in your > > statistics, this file is useful, but not really needed to be > > translated (I translated it only in order to get 100% ^^), IMHO of > > course. > > I think it'd be better to have a list of contributors rather than a revision history log. A list of contributors would be great, but we haven't figured out how to do that. In the past we have tried but have never been able to get it right, especially with the translators. Perhaps the new tx offers some options we haven't examined. For writers, we can check the wiki history, git commits and bugzilla, but there tend to be a lot of translators that we don't know how to identify. As far as the revision history, that is necessary. However, I also question the value of translating it. --McD -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
