Copyright notice (was: Docs Project meeting minutes 13 July 2011)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

> From: "Eric Christensen" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

(...)

> * Copyright changes for all guides (Sparks, 23:43:48)
> * LINK:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2011-June/013474.html
> (Sparks, 23:44:04)
> * ACTION: Sparks to file a bug to continue the discussion on whether
> or not the copyright holder can come from a Publican brand (Sparks,
> 23:51:54)

As a follow-up to the copyright discussion we had during the IRC meeting: 
my point was that some [previous] authors of Fedora docs were not necessarily 
Fedora Contributors at time of authorship (like e.g. Eric Foster-Johnson 
who wrote the original RPM Guide, AFAIK).

Maybe adding "and others" at the end of the copyright notice would solve the 
problem in such cases?

This leads us to another question: How do we define a Fedora Contributor? As 
someone who has signed up for a Fedora Account, or someone who has submitted 
a patch, content and/or other form of contribution to Fedora Project but has 
not necessarily signed up for an account, or... ?

Yes, these are multiple questions actually. :-)

I agree that it's best to consult a lawyer (again) on this matter.

Cheers,
-- 
Petr Kovar
Content Author | Engineering Content Services
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
-- 
docs mailing list
docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux