On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:38:17PM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote: > On 06/03/2010 05:13 PM, Zach Oglesby wrote: > > While looking at bugs assigned to the Docs team a saw at least 3 bugs > > that talked about Publican being a temp solution. It seems that at > > least a few people outside of Docs are not that happy with what > > Publican provides. > > Can you give us the bug numbers because I'm not sure that I've seen the > tickets. I know of a couple of implementation bugs that are being > worked right now but they didn't give me heartburn over keeping Publican. I don't consider myself "outside" but the most glaring problem we have now is what has been induced by changing the entire site structure: * Broken links from Google that bring the user back to a front page * An embedded search that brings users to Google, which doesn't work and often brings the user back... (etc.) Some of this might change as Google re-indexes content, but we really do need to keep a careful eye on how the user experience of finding our docs content is working. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
