-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First, let me say what an awesome job John (jjmcd) and others have been doing on the Release Notes. We continue to get kudos from the readers out there, which is most awesome. Earlier today we did get a bit of "I wish I could have seen X in your RNs"[1]. The requester's problem is not that we didn't talk about the new backup solution but rather we didn't talk about the fact that the old solution went away. What I envision is a categorical representation of changes. This means, in this case, that the default backup solution for Fedora changed. We should not only document the change but also talk about what's going to happen to the previous default and maybe a migration path. This is going to take better communication with developers and probably RELENG. I'm open to ideas, though! [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600249 - --Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMCRJrAAoJEDbiLlqcYamxBwAP/itpakCFuebz6lrR8eCTeKsy x73p07J+nSbs2Iwi6vn3rzMZXT/uSWOgKB8GrNKDZlfuX0Q8hmBUwrqe8Mpdg0fz 6Bi7oMSW8gnyo98U+1hpzYApDgoHp4MuMSxG7wuwrXVZAGQY1YPKr29YM7S+02A5 JLvVNwjBQFNTHxE1cmmPN7DHokd2Mz02ytNBtDH66E4lCdb4Tux+0vopDnCuGqqr hJmNm5Np+8wLxtvjpM7W+QCuI5ypvo6wx+muSqXyzfwJsH8rVWJs8ZXJBWBNO5Xr R1oFDyraWOxZ9hfJYx4quHV1R7urxSZV2oTKqIDYu9fEsoKDPKXE7wXar/SdXVxD 2XgYfeoIM+u5PgABz5dnWDmYpAEetC59+YbrYz1ImGQSX57FI9558WHSfjuOE9gf z1XkWtz9MPMYFdOkHyyMOJ43P1M5KG7wLsytY+cvXPwm//v1mFsHJ4H8fk2yDjBL cLwcfkeC7DCXabWBGwbMLoqRawRXhtyZNEYD3gc9rP/Wp6dliR+ESB2NCJqov5fm 3b49PMmWvHB8nySvl8BpzUoTXhg1sF9d/h/6+uUEhnhoBU8u/xdDJH1ZITbhXweT bMmiBQg5AmutVCNeRUcXnOzum3OFQUd+3bvfdnzD++P5nW1ZsA6S/LFM/UUEbu0Y bLsOOrA3gWWtd8h89Kwn =Mk0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
