On 05/19/2010 11:07 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:42:27AM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote: > >> The question was raised about those contributors that work with the Docs >> Project, that don't need access to the repos, but are working with the >> Project. In FAS they would just have the cla_done group. There are >> activities within Fedora that require cla_done + one group in order for >> the contributor to participate. These activities include voting, >> e-mail, and others. It was confirmed by Nick (NB) that removing the >> group from your FAS would remove those activities as well. >> > Given that removal from that one's CLA+1 group removes functionality, > I can live with the three-group approach. :-) I still believe we need > to have a policy of many sponsors -- and promoting contributors to > sponsors when they show they're willing to collaborate -- to make sure > new contributors can always get approvals easily, and in turn work > with us. > Yeah, Stickster's arguments in the meeting last week won me over to the two-group model, but the reduced functionality pointed out by nb is a dealbreaker; I think we need to keep the entry-level group. Cheers Rudi -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
