On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 10:17 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Nick Bebout <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These are the possible ideas I've heard so far: > > > > 1. Separate groups for each document as it is now, but give document > > owners and other experienced members sponsor status > > > > 2. Use "docs" as the commit group for all of our documents. > > > > 3. Use "docs" as a tracking group for all docs project members, grant > > "gitdocs" to give commit access to all documents when the member gets a > > little experience. (Eliminate the separate groups for each document.) > > > > 4. Change nothing > > I pick #3. It strikes the best balance between ease of use and still > keeps training wheels for the new members. > > (I loved the jumping-off-the-roof analogy that Sparks offered. > Probably because I enjoy jumping off of things so much.) > > -- > Ben Cotton I like #3 but modified with some #1, about having more sponsors for members that are comfortable. It does/would make it easier with more members able to help out with sponsorship during hackfests and bug stomping party's. Eli -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
