On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 02:27:26PM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 14:17, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > 11:12 < quaid> ok, here's a thought ... >> > 11:12 < quaid> long tradition is that 'docs' gave full commit access >> > to content; I see people still do >> > that with f'hosted repos >> > 11:12 < quaid> (mostly) >> > 11:13 < quaid> we had publishing separate because it was different, >> > separate, required training to not >> > break, etc. >> > 11:13 < quaid> but if we're going to be publishing websites with >> > publican as the cms (basically) >> > 11:13 < quaid> why not just use 'docs' group as who can publish? >> > >> > What I was also saying is that we have this: >> > >> > CMS for docs.fp.o: >> > * Publican handles publishing and building of content for the web. >> > * FAS handles authentication. >> > * Beacon with DocBook extensions could be the wysiwyg editor. >> > >> > 'docs' group membership could be sufficient for publishing. Why add >> > another group when we have one well populated with all the people we >> > want able to publish immediately? >> > >> > This lowers the barriers a lot for using Publican, but it doesn't give >> > us a CMS that invites the 10x participation that we get through the >> > wiki-like interfaces. Having an easy web authentication layer with a >> > nice WYSIWYG editor (and a publish button) is a very important goal. >> >> Want to fold in the individual guide repos (fhosted.o) as well? > > You could actually do this without just chgrp'ing everything, if > there's ACL support there. Just add permissions for the docs group as > ACLs for all the repos. That gives extra flexibility for the future > and accomplishes the goal at the same time. > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com > -- > docs mailing list > docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs > Per my task from tonights Docs meeting - anyone else have input on this proposal?? Thoughts?? comments?? flames?? -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
