On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:08:28AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote: > On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 21:24 -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > Looks like this needs to: > > > > Requires: /usr/bin/htmlview > > I guess I didn't realize I had to specify the full path. Looking at > other specs, it seems customary to use > > Requires: htmlview > > which is already in the spec. Or do I need Requires xdg-utils since in > F12 there was an htmlview package. Sorry I didn't see this before we talked, John! (I don't sync my mail constantly, so that I can definitively say at some point each time I do email, "I'm done, time to do something else.") The answer is that "Requires: htmlview" is a *package* level dependency, while "Requires: /usr/bin/htmlview" is a *file* level dependency. Cool that RPM supports this, I don't think it's possible in some other software management systems. So that means that the first case only works as long as the package name stays the same. The second case works no matter if the binary moves to a differently-named package (which happens F12 -> F13). -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- docs mailing list docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
