On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 18:06, Eric Christensen <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:20, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 09/10/2009 01:40 PM, Douglas Silas wrote: >>> I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a >>> ticket for this request: >>> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667 >>> >>> Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide" component >>> under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There seems to be some >>> confusion about this. >>> >> Infrastructure is mostly unclear as to what the Fedora Documentation >> Project is intending here. >> >> * Is this rename something that Fedora Documentation would like to do >> across the Board? > > No. > >> >> * Does Fedora Documentation want individual Guide maintainers to have >> the option to rename but not want to rename all Guides? > > I think this should probably be brought before the group. > >> >> * If it is indeed to be moved from the "Fedora Documentation" product to >> the "Fedora" product, why is that? Normally, "Fedora" is for packages >> in the distro and there's no package for the deployment guide (at least, >> not yet). >> >> * If shifting bugzilla products, does that need to be coordinated with >> the Packaging side of the project by talking to FESCo? >> >> And lots of other questions like this :-) Fedora Infrastructure can >> make changes, but we'd be making changes to things owned by docs and >> fesco so we want to make sure that the relevant owners are on-board with >> the changes. >> >> -Toshio >> > > Eric > Sorry for being short... I'm not feeling well today. --Eric -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
