On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:42:22PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I don't see a particular need for a graphic, but it wouldn't be a > problem although it would have to be included in that common content > store as well. I would suggest you file a bug with the particulars of > what you want to change, against publican-fedora. Since the CC people do such a good job of spreading their useful graphics, I recommend we use them. It helps carry the meaning. Aesthetics. All that. > That's probably a question for fedora-legal-list, but my guess is > Unported -- I'm not sure Legal sees the use in the ported version, in > any language. Richard Fontana replied to this discussion clarifying that it is the unported. Sorry if I left that an open question -- I did clarify via fedora-legal-list a few weeks ago. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00028.html - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgpqSPW0JBkX9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
