On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 21:10 -0400, Matthew Daniels wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:06:52AM +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > >> Some thoughts on the UG, based on what I saw while converting it to build > >> in Publican and publishing it for the F11 release: > > [...snip...] > > > > This is one of the best summaries I've seen about where the UG might > > go in the future to become an invaluable resource to users. > > Brilliant. > I have to agree wholeheartedly. Incredible insights, Rudi. I didn't > imagine I'd get such a thorough and well-thought-out response when I > started this thread. > > Eric, I'm going to try to make it to the next FDSCo meeting Wednesday; > if I get this on the agenda, can we dedicate some time to talking > about it? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkpWlR0ACgkQ8q6Smu6JjusJoQCeNvcxVzPY9obPF/mZdn1maLNa > DPUAn3J2Ay3t05u2dgEfUjMcWAW7gpbQ > =AqWq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > You put it on the agenda and we'll discuss it. Eric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
