On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Ian Weller<ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:50:52PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> I put up a simple test page here: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_page_for_mwlib >> > Thanks :) > > Thanks also to Dave Nalley volunteered to commandeer the effort to fix > this crapola I created (whee!) so I'll double check that he read this (I > assume so). > >> Good news and bad news: >> >> * Upstream mwlib is really chugging along. That's healthy. >> >> * Current mwlib is now at 0.11.2, which is way ahead of our anemic >> 0.9.10. It now requires odfpy==0.9. >> >> * odfpy-0.9 shouldn't be too hard to do, right? I think mwlib is the >> only thing using it. >> > Correct AFAIK... > >> * Oh wait, did I mention there's more? mwlib-0.11.2 also needs >> python-lockfile>=0.8 and python-timelib>=0.2, neither of which we >> have yet, meaning more packaging. >> > Oh did I mention there's some dependency epic fail going on in EL-5? I > don't know what to do about it, nor do I remember what it is, but it has > something to do with a Python library being an older version that what > we need and the maintainer isn't willing to update because it would > break previous code. I'm thinking of dropping EPEL for both of these > packages (it was odfpy that was the culprit when I was updating it to > 0.9). > > -- > Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 > > -- > fedora-docs-list mailing list > fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list > Yes I have been reading and started looking at this tonight. Hopefully will have a bit more time tomorrow to dedicate to it. -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
