On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:48 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 06/25/2009 03:22 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > > When we went from GFDL to OPL we specifically had to ask everyone > > because none of the content works were under the Fedora CLA. The > > stated reasoning at the time iirc was, we wouldn't have to do this > > check with everyone again if we had to relicense because we had the > > CLA. > > I think the important distinction that I missed was that I thought you > were only referring to the reference documentation in the separate files > (e.g. Release Guide), where there are well defined lists of the > contributors. For the wiki, that task is far too major and we would > definitely want to leverage the CLA to relicense that content. > There is still a problem, though. Most, if not all, of our guides start on the wiki. I know a lot of information that went into the Security Guide came from the wiki and thus from various developers. > > ~spot > Eric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
