Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504063 --- Comment #3 from John J. McDonough <wb8rcr@xxxxxxxx> 2009-06-04 14:03:18 EDT --- > I think we've pushed pretty hard to get the RPMs from Publican fixed > upstream and approved by Fedora. I'm not sure what else we need to > do to just spit out the RPMs as I thought all our problems had been > solved. I was under the impression that we were going after the RPM naming issue, but hadn't thought about multiple language RPMs. Based on last night's meeting I'm not sure we even know whether we will produce single-language RPMs or multiple like we do now. And then of course there is the issue of multiple docs in one RPM with different targets (as in f-r-n currently). > I didn't think we were just going to point to an html. Errr... are we > talking about local html or pointing it to a website somewhere? Ahh context. Currently, we use yelp to display the release notes and about-fedora. I gathered last night there was some concensus to move away from that toward HTML on disk and a menu item pointing to it. Publican will do that in a Publican-generated RPM, but it will do that for one language and it isn't at all clear that if multiple languages are installed it knows how to change that entry for the currently logged in language (as yelp does). Even if we decide on one RPM per language, I think we need to address the case of multiple languages installed on one PC. Perhaps Publican magically deals with all this, but I haven't seen any evidence so I'm skeptical. Should it? Absolutely! But it does seem like it may be asking a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
