Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504063 Eric Christensen <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|kwade@xxxxxxxxxx |eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-04 13:23:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1) Partly because of Publican weirdness, but also because we were clinging on > to Gnome help, we manually produced the RPM for f-r-n. How hard do we want to > push to get upstream to produce useable RPMs? My spin is that with a single > document the process is simple enough that getting it fixed in Publican is more > work than just doing it. I think we've pushed pretty hard to get the RPMs from Publican fixed upstream and approved by Fedora. I'm not sure what else we need to do to just spit out the RPMs as I thought all our problems had been solved. > 2) If we are going to simply point to an html from the menu, how do we handle > languages? I know it can be done, I just don't know how. We need to identify > that and document it. I didn't think we were just going to point to an html. Errr... are we talking about local html or pointing it to a website somewhere? > 3) Is there really any issue with languages once we have the new Transifex. I don't think there are any more issues... but I don't know that it's been tested so I won't say there won't be. Is there a test version of the new Transifex available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
